- Ethical Issues - Should some research be avoided because of the potential social consequences?
• Deception, privacy, protection from harm, confidentiality, right to withdraw.
• BPA guidelines.
- Cultural Bias - Can results be generalised to other cultures?
• Ethnocentrism
• Eurocentrism
• Cultural Relativism
• Etic analysis - Behaviour is universal and cultural differences can be ignored.
• Emic analysis - Behaviour is culturally specific.
- Gender Bias - Should gender differences be ignored?
• Alpha bias - Assumes real differences between males and females.
• Beta bias - Assumes there are no differences between men and women, or that any differences are trivial.
- Imposed Etics - One way of overcoming the problem of restricted sampling is to encourage research which uses participants from other cultures.
- Derived Etics - A series of emic studies takes place in a local setting conducted by local researchers using local techniques.
Tuesday 21 July 2015
Approaches
Behavioural | Evolutionary | Cognitive | Psychodynamic | Biological | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Principle | All behaviour is acquired through learning and behaviour is all that should concern psychologists. Explains behaviour in terms of conditioning. | Explains behaviour in terms of selective pressures that have shaped it (characteristics have been naturally selected). Behaviour is essential for survival. | Thinking shapes our behaviour. | Early experiences have a lasting effect on our behaviour and personality. This focuses on the id, ego and superego. | Explains behaviour in terms of physical bodily processes. |
Strengths |
|
|
|
|
|
Limitations |
|
|
|
|
|
Monday 20 July 2015
Idiographic Vs Nomothetic
Nomothetic | Idiographic | |
---|---|---|
Definition | The approach of investigating groups of people to try to find general laws of behaviour that apply to everyone. | The approach of investigating individuals in personal, in-depth detail to achieve a unique understanding of them. |
Assumptions and Methods | • Assumes that people are best studied by large scale, preferable experimental methods to identify laws. • Differences between people are only quantitative, so an individual will be compared to others, classified with others, measured as a score or be a statistic. |
• Assumes each human is unique and best investigated by the case study method. • Differences between people are qualitative so studies focus on unique aspects of thinking and behaviour. |
Examples | • Behaviourist experiments on learning conducted on many subjects and replicated to find principles which were generalised to humans. • Asch and Milgram • Personality tests, IQ scores, classification manuals for mental health, etc. |
• Humanistic psychologists focus on unique characteristics and life experiences of individuals. • Allport (1961) made the distinction between common and individual traits. • Kelly (1955) tried to identify the way individuals perceive the world in terms of personal constructs. • Freud used the clinical case study method to find a patient;s psychological problems. |
Reductionism Vs Holism and Interactionism
Reductionism: Complex phenomena is broken down into more simple components. It should be explained by simple underlying principles. While this doesn't explore the whole picture, it does allow in-depth study and gain a better understanding.
Holism and Interactionism: Holism looks at same/higher level explanation. Interactionism shows how many aspects of a phenomenon or levels of explanation can interact together to provide a complete picture.
Examples in psychology:
• Evolutionary reductionism - behaviour must have been adaptive and inherited. Ignored cultural variations.
• Environmental reductionism - relates to behaviourist approach and tries to explain all human behaviour in terms of simple conditioning. Ignores cognitive processes.
• Methodological reductionism - Certain variables are identified and ten studied in a controlled experiment.
Holism and Interactionism: Holism looks at same/higher level explanation. Interactionism shows how many aspects of a phenomenon or levels of explanation can interact together to provide a complete picture.
Examples in psychology:
• Evolutionary reductionism - behaviour must have been adaptive and inherited. Ignored cultural variations.
• Environmental reductionism - relates to behaviourist approach and tries to explain all human behaviour in terms of simple conditioning. Ignores cognitive processes.
• Methodological reductionism - Certain variables are identified and ten studied in a controlled experiment.
Free Will Vs Determinism
Determinism: The view that an individual's behaviour is shaped or controlled by internal or external forces rather than an individual's free will to do something.
Free Will: Individuals have an active role in controlling their behaviour.
The determinism approach implies that people are not personally responsible for their behaviour, placing the blame on innate factors such as neurochemicals. This poses the moral question whether a person can be help personally responsible for something they've done.
Soft determinism: If our actions are voluntary and in line with our conscious desired goals then they are free.
Examples in Psychology
Cognitive - Relating to soft determinism, considering problem solving and attentional mechanisms of thought and behaviour. These mechanisms operate with the parameters of their innate capabilities and our past experience suggests that we are not free to choose what we see.
Behavioural - An extreme environmental determinism approach, arguing that learning from the environment causes behaviour. Skinner argued that free will is completely an illusion created by our complexity of learning.
Psychoanalysis - The view of unconscious determinism - that our behaviour is controlled by forces of which we are unaware - the reasons for our actions are merely rationalised by our conscious minds.
Biological - Look at the deterministic influence of genetics, brain structure and biochemistry.
Free Will: Individuals have an active role in controlling their behaviour.
The determinism approach implies that people are not personally responsible for their behaviour, placing the blame on innate factors such as neurochemicals. This poses the moral question whether a person can be help personally responsible for something they've done.
Soft determinism: If our actions are voluntary and in line with our conscious desired goals then they are free.
Examples in Psychology
Cognitive - Relating to soft determinism, considering problem solving and attentional mechanisms of thought and behaviour. These mechanisms operate with the parameters of their innate capabilities and our past experience suggests that we are not free to choose what we see.
Behavioural - An extreme environmental determinism approach, arguing that learning from the environment causes behaviour. Skinner argued that free will is completely an illusion created by our complexity of learning.
Psychoanalysis - The view of unconscious determinism - that our behaviour is controlled by forces of which we are unaware - the reasons for our actions are merely rationalised by our conscious minds.
Biological - Look at the deterministic influence of genetics, brain structure and biochemistry.
Nature Vs Nurture
Nature: People are the product of their genes and innate biological factors.
Nurture: People are a product of all things that come about through maturation and also everything learned through interactions with the environment as well as upbringing.
Nature and Nurture views are often perceived as determinist, however, this is mistaken as evolutionary psychologists suggest that genes only predispose us to behave in certain ways and this doesn't dictate what people choose to do.
An argument to one side of the approach can easily ignore the other end of the spectrum.
Nurture: People are a product of all things that come about through maturation and also everything learned through interactions with the environment as well as upbringing.
Nature and Nurture views are often perceived as determinist, however, this is mistaken as evolutionary psychologists suggest that genes only predispose us to behave in certain ways and this doesn't dictate what people choose to do.
An argument to one side of the approach can easily ignore the other end of the spectrum.
Nature | Nurture | |
---|---|---|
Roots of the approach | Nativist philosophy, biology and evolutionary theory. | Empiricism philosophy and social psychology. |
Causes of behaviour | Genetic determinism, inherited influence, maturational blueprint, neurochemical and hormonal influences and brain activity. | The mind is regarded as a 'black slate' at birth and therefore, knowledge and behaviour are the result of experience and learning from the environment. |
Methods employed | Gene/chromosome mapping, twin and adoption studies, brain scanning, brain stimulation or damage studies and drug testing. | Use of classical and operant conditioning techniques to affect behaviour, manipulation of social environment to change behaviour. |
Implication | Due to biological determinism, behaviour can only be changed through physical means, such as selective breeding, gene therapy, brain surgery or drugs. | Due to environmental determinism, behaviour can easily be changed through manipulating reinforcement and environmental conditions. |
Criticisms | Reductionist - may neglect environmental factors. | Reductionist - may neglect biological factors. |
Debates
In psychology there are four main debates:
1. Nature vs Nurture
2. Determinism vs Free Will
3. Reductionism vs Holism
4. Idiographic vs Nomothetic
1. Nature vs Nurture
2. Determinism vs Free Will
3. Reductionism vs Holism
4. Idiographic vs Nomothetic
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)